<rt id="bn8ez"></rt>
<label id="bn8ez"></label>

  • <span id="bn8ez"></span>

    <label id="bn8ez"><meter id="bn8ez"></meter></label>

    隨筆-38  評論-137  文章-64  trackbacks-0
      MSNBC.com

    ‘I Don’t Feel Free Yet’
    Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena discusses her hostage experience and the controversy over the U.S. soldiers who shot her

    WEB EXCLUSIVE
    By Cristiana Fabiani
    Newsweek
    Updated: 4:57 p.m. ET May 5, 2005

    May 5 - Journalist Giuliana Sgrena thought her monthlong Iraq hostage ordeal was over when Italian intelligence agents rescued her on March 4. But just 25 minutes after her release, she faced another danger—this time from U.S. troops. The soldiers, stationed at a military roadblock on the way to Baghdad’s international airport, opened fired on her car, killing agent Nicola Calipari and injuring Sgrena and the Italian driver of the car.

    Italian outrage over Calipari’s death has escalated in recent days, following the release of two contradictory reports into the shooting. An American report, released last weekend, exonerated the U.S. soldiers and claimed the Italians had failed to inform them about the operation to free Sgrena. An Italian report, released Monday, rebutted the charges and blamed the killing on fatigued and inexperienced G.I.s staffing poorly run roadblocks.

    The incident has caused tensions in the alliance between Rome and Washington, increasing Italian calls for the removal of their country’s 3,000 troops in Iraq. Sgrena spoke to NEWSWEEK’s Cristiana Fabiani about the shooting and her experience as a hostage. Excerpts:

    NEWSWEEK:  To what extent do you agree with the U.S. and Italian reports about the shooting?
    SGRENA: They are very different reports even though they have some parts in common. The American report tries to justify and totally absolve American troops, while, to my pleasant surprise, the Italian one is very documented, even though some parts of it are missing because they are classified. The Italian report takes into consideration several accounts that also appear in the U.S. report, but the [U.S. report] does not highlight some of the contradictions in the accounts made by the U.S. patrol soldiers.

    Could you give an example of the contradictions?
    One is, for instance, the car’s speed. There was no posted speed limit [and] the fact is that the car could not have gone at a high speed given the road conditions. Moreover, if the car had been going as fast as the U.S. soldiers claim, they would not have had time to make any of the signals they insist they made. The real problem is that the Americans did not make any signal. [Also, according to the U.S. report] only one person in the patrol was in charge of lifting the spotlight, shouting, warning us to stop, shooting warning shots and then shooting straight at us—and all of that within a few seconds. It is clear that he would not have had the time to do all this,

    Did you see a light signal?
    No. There was no light signal.

    Did you see a laser signal?
    No. They shot straight at us.

    They fired warning shots, didn’t they?
    No. The shots arrived straight at us.

    What happened when the car approached the roadblock?
    We didn’t see any roadblock. We saw nothing. At a certain point, we were on this road and there was a curve. The driver had just said that we were 700 meters [about 770 yards] away from the airport and suddenly we were hit by a light and strafed by a machine gun.

    So there was a light?
    It was at the same time we were hit, at the time we were shot. The bullets and a beam of light hit us simultaneously.

    What happened during and after the shooting?
    The driver said, “We are under attack.” Frankly I could not understand who could attack us in that area. The driver shouted, “We are from the Italian Embassy,” from inside the car. Calipari threw himself over me. I fell through the seats. When the fire stopped—it did not last very long, I believe they calculated 15 seconds, but it seems like an eternity when you are there—at some point the soldiers approached….

    I was in the back. The soldiers came, looked and realized that Calipari was dead. Calipari wasn’t speaking any longer. I felt his body heavy on me. I tried to lift him up and heard him gasping. Then the soldiers arrived and shook him a little bit. They took me out from the other side, because I was injured. They laid me down outside. They tore off my clothes to see where the injury was because I was bleeding heavily.

    The Italian report talks about the involuntary killing of Calipari. But you have said that the shooting could have been intentional.
    I can’t say that the killing was intentional, but from the report it seems to me that the creation of an incident was intentional. In any case, all the conditions existed for an incident to happen. Nobody warned the patrol that we were on our way, even though the U.S. command knew at 8:30 p.m. that we were coming on that road.

    Why would the Americans have wanted an incident?
    You should ask them, but the convoy escorting [U.S. Ambassador John] Negroponte had already arrived at Camp Victory before 8 p.m., so why did [the U.S. command] tell the soldiers that they could not leave their positions? … The road was not closed anymore by the time we arrived [at 8.45 p.m.]. They had closed it previously but at that point it was not closed anymore.

    Why would the incident been intentional?
    The big controversy is the Italian policy toward hostages: the fact that Italians negotiate with kidnappers and pay ransoms. Americans don’t want it, they’ve always been opposed to it.

    American media have reported that the Italian government paid a large ransom to release you. CNN mentioned an amount of $10 million.
    I don’t know if a ransom was paid. In any case this amount seems an exaggeration. I believe that there could have been some ransom paid. From what I understood, my kidnappers did not take me to get money—they were more politically motivated. It is very likely that they negotiated on other terms, not only financial.

    The fact is that you have been released while French journalist Florence Aubenas and her interpreter Hussein Hanoun have been held hostages in Iraq since Jan. 5.
    I believe that Calipari’s killing has contributed to the fact that Florence hasn’t been released yet. Our intelligence had a big presence on the field, because it had already released several hostages. They knew people. Italians were better positioned than the French there. The obstacles put in place by the Americans are even stronger for the French then they are for the Italians, who are strong [U.S.] allies … After our incident, even kidnappers will be more reluctant to get in touch with intelligence officers.

    Did your driver make it somehow clear, through his phone calls, that the Americans knew that you were on that road?
    As you know, Italians don’t contact Americans directly. They go through a liaison officer. The driver was making phone calls to the officer who was in touch with the Americans, so it was clear that the Americans knew of our arrival … During the entire time I was in the kidnappers’ car waiting to be [handed to the Italian agents] I had an American helicopter stationed over my head. With all the technological means they have at their disposal, do you really believe that they were up there without knowing what was going on below? I don’t think so.

    What do you think of the way the shooting inquiry was carried out?
    I believe it was done to appease the Italians, although in the end we were not happy with it. Moreover, the Americans destroyed some evidence [by] cleaning up the area where the incident happened. In order to calculate the car’s speed, all one had to do was leave it there and one would have known immediately how fast it was going. Also, if they had left the bullets there they would have known exactly how many had been fired.

    Do you have any idea of the identity of the group that kidnapped you?
    I have no idea, but I can exclude that it was a terrorist group like [that run by Al Qaeda’s] al-Zarqawi or common criminals.

    How long had you been in Iraq, this time, before you were taken hostage?
    Ten days

    Did you fear for your life during your captivity?
    Yes. They never threatened to kill me. On the contrary they always told me that they would not have killed me, unless there had been a rescue attempt. But how can you trust anybody in a situation like that one?

    Did they treat you well?
    I was a prisoner, locked up, but in material things they treated me well. I was not blindfolded.

    Are you undergoing daily physical therapy for the shoulder injured in the shooting? 
    Yes, for my shoulder and my arm. My shoulder was totally reconstructed and they did a good job, too. I had a bullet hole with a 4cm [almost 1.6 inches] diameter. I had surgery at the military hospital in Rome.

    Do you have any idea of when you’ll be able to go back to work?
    No, they tell me I need to wait for months. I hope it will be less. It’s very hard. I cannot use the computer, and I am still very confused mentally, I cannot write nor read. I cannot read a book.

    Will you go back to Iraq?
    I will not go back to Iraq unless the situation changes. I have no prospects of working there under the current conditions. If I go there I want to have the chance to talk to people, I don’t want to remain in a hotel. And I don’t want to go around escorted by the military. This is not the way I work, and I discovered that there I cannot do otherwise.

    Would you go back to another war zone as a journalist?
    Yes, as soon as I get well.

    What’s your wish for the future of Iraq?
    I wish all the troops would withdraw.

    And your wish for your own future?
    I know my life has changed and so have my priorities, but I am unable to make plans or projects at this point. I need to get over this phase. After my release I had a moment when I felt free from the nightmare, and then the shooting stopped everything. I don’t feel free yet.

    ? 2005 Newsweek, Inc.

    ? 2005 MSNBC.com

    URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7751340/site/newsweek/page/2/

    posted on 2005-06-15 16:03 c.c. 閱讀(650) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: News from NEWSWEEK
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲日韩精品无码专区| jizz18免费视频| 亚洲精品一级无码鲁丝片| 毛片基地看看成人免费| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久2| 一二三四免费观看在线视频中文版 | 免费a级毛片高清视频不卡| 国产成人亚洲综合a∨| 亚洲精品~无码抽插| 成年在线网站免费观看无广告 | 亚洲综合色婷婷在线观看| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲av| 久久久高清免费视频 | 91精品导航在线网址免费| 日韩欧美亚洲中文乱码| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 妞干网免费视频在线观看| 成全动漫视频在线观看免费高清版下载| 亚洲av永久综合在线观看尤物| 狠狠亚洲婷婷综合色香五月排名 | 日本特黄特黄刺激大片免费| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看网站| 亚洲夂夂婷婷色拍WW47| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码下载| 波多野结衣中文一区二区免费| 最近中文字幕mv免费高清视频8| 永久免费无码网站在线观看个| 亚洲人和日本人jizz| 免费看一区二区三区四区| 国产精品无码一区二区三区免费| 中文字幕乱码免费看电影| 亚洲欧洲国产综合AV无码久久| 亚洲一区影音先锋色资源| 亚洲国产精品自产在线播放 | 在线观看无码的免费网站| a级片在线免费看| 美女被羞羞网站免费下载| 亚洲天然素人无码专区| 亚洲精品视频在线观看免费| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久久狼| 亚洲Aⅴ无码一区二区二三区软件 亚洲AⅤ视频一区二区三区 |