<rt id="bn8ez"></rt>
<label id="bn8ez"></label>

  • <span id="bn8ez"></span>

    <label id="bn8ez"><meter id="bn8ez"></meter></label>

    Sealyu

    --- 博客已遷移至: http://www.sealyu.com/blog

      BlogJava :: 首頁 :: 新隨筆 :: 聯(lián)系 :: 聚合  :: 管理 ::
      618 隨筆 :: 87 文章 :: 225 評論 :: 0 Trackbacks

    About a year and an half ago I wrote an entry about the problem that rises when mapping an entity with multiple bags using eager fetching. At the end of the entry I suggested three different solutions: (a) to use lazy fetching, (b) to use sets instead of bags, and (c) to use the @IndexColumn annotation. Few months later I elaborated on the usage of @IndexColumn, this time another way – using the @CollectionId annotation.

    Environment

    ·         Hibernate Entity Manager – 3.3.1.GA

    ·         Hibernate core – 3.2.5.GA

    ·         Hibernate annotations- 3.3.0.GA

    ·         Database – PostgreSQL 8.1

    First one, first…

    Just before we start a warning – the @CollectionId annotation is a Hibernate specific annotation – not a part of the specification. And it doesn't work on one-to-many associations (but it can be used in conjunction with one-to-many associations). After putting that behind of us lets see the problem.

     

    The Problem

    Assume the following entities relation, a parent entity has two collections of child entities. Both collections should be eagerly loaded.


    First try will be to just to map it as is (Child1 has a many-to-many association; Child2 has a one-to-many):

     
    @ManyToMany( fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
    @JoinTable(name = "PARENT_CHILD1", 
    joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "PARENT_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID"), 
    inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "CHILD1_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID"))
    List<Child1> child1s = new LinkedList<Child1>();
     
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    List<Child2> child2s = new LinkedList<Child2>();

    But when loading a persistence unit with the above configuration the "org.hibernate.HibernateException: cannot simultaneously fetch multiple bags" will be thrown.

    Using an idbag

    The reason is that when we add the @CollectionId to a List or a Collection its semantics changes from "just a bag" to "a bag with primary key" (a.k.a, idbag). It means that a surrogate key is assigned to each row on the collection

    When transforming the association to Child1 into an idbag (using the @CollectionId annotation) the problem is solved. The reason is that when we switch the association semantics from "a simple bag" to "a bag with primary key" (a.k.a, idbag) it means that a surrogate key is assigned to each row on the collection.

    @Entity
    public class Parent {
    ………
    @ManyToMany( fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
    @JoinTable(name = "PARENT_CHILD1", 
    joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "PARENT_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID"), 
    inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "CHILD1_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID"))
    @GenericGenerator(name="uuid-gen", strategy = "uuid")
    @CollectionId(columns = @Column(name = "COL_ID"), type = @Type(type = "string"), generator = "uuid-gen")List<Child1> child1s = new LinkedList<Child1>();
     
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    List<Child2> child2s = new LinkedList<Child2>();
    }

    The problem with bags is that when Hibernate eagerly loads multiple collections it issues an outer join select to the RDBMS which can cause multiple entries on some of the collections. But when using an idbag each row in the collections is uniquely identified by the surrogate key, therefore Hibernate can identify it within the collection, even if the SQL statement returns an entry more than once.

    Notice the usage of a generator assigned to the collection id, the generator is responsible for creating the surrogate keys of the collection rows. I decided to use the UUID strategy. You can, of course, use JPA standard generators (such as Sequence or Table generators). The @CollectionId references the COL_ID column on PARENT_CHILD1 table (the join table). The value of the collection id is invisible to the application (it is not being mapped to a property).

     

    So why not on one-to-many

    The Hibernate annotations documentation says that to announce idbag semantics you should assign the @CollectionId to a @ManyToMany, @CollectionOfElements, or @OneToMany (look at the table on this section), but the Hibernate core documentation it says "Hibernate provides a feature that allows you to map many to many associations and collections of values to a table with a surrogate key." (here). I've tried it and indeed when annotating a @OneToMany collection with the @CollectionId an exception with the message "one-to-many collections with identifiers are not supported " is thrown by Hibernate.

    Idbag - Not Just For Eager Fetching

    Don't forge that you can use idbag for reasons other than solving multiple eager associations. For example it can give a major performance boost over simple bags for mutative operations. If entries in a collection have surrogate keys Hibernate will be able to locate the matching rows in the database using these keys (each row in the association table becomes unique) – there is no need for the fetch -> delete-all -> insert-all cycle when updating the collection.



    Posted at 03:49PM Jan 18, 2008 by Eyal Lupu in Persistence  |  Comments[6]

    Comments:

    Actually a @OneToMany @JoinTable would work (as opposed to @OneToMany @JoinColumn)

    Posted by Emmanuel Bernard on January 21, 2008 at 09:33 PM GMT+02:00 #

    Thanks Emmanuel,

    Maybe it worth a comment in the documentation. I guess this is actually an Hibernate core's issue (not an Hibernate annotation one - is it?).

    Posted by Eyal Lupu on January 21, 2008 at 11:56 PM GMT+02:00 #

    So, if I have 2 parallel OneToMany collections it's not fixable with:

    @OneToMany @CollectionId
    List<Son> getSons() {...}

    @OneToMany @CollectionId
    List<Daughter> getDaughter() {...}

    But if they were ManyToMany collections it is fixable?

    Strange :) Any particular reason?

    Posted by Geoffrey De Smet on January 23, 2008 at 11:11 AM GMT+02:00 #

    Hi Geoffrey,
    Yes - you have understood it correctly.

    I guess the reason is that regular one-to-many associations have a foreign key on the child record and there is no place to store the collection id there.

    However, see Emmanuel comment above - you can solve it using a join table.

    Posted by Eyal Lupu on January 23, 2008 at 11:59 AM GMT+02:00 #

    Year the documentation should be clearer.

    Posted by Emmanuel Bernard on January 23, 2008 at 04:48 PM GMT+02:00 #

    There is fourth solution of this problem. Works for both @OneToMany and @ManyToMany:

    @OneToMany(mappedBy="account", cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
    @LazyCollection(LazyCollectionOption.FALSE)
    private List<Entry> entries;

    Annotation @LazyCollection(LazyCollectionOption.FALSE) makes that collecion is loaded like with FetchType.EAGER and you can use it on two and more collections.
    This solution is (in my opinion) better because it's simplier. :)

    Posted by Bartosz Jakubowski on October 22, 2008 at 01:26 PM GMT+02:00 #

    posted on 2009-08-27 16:56 seal 閱讀(563) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: Hibernate
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费无码作爱视频| 亚洲综合色视频在线观看| 黄色毛片免费观看| A在线观看免费网站大全| 羞羞网站在线免费观看| 亚洲AV无码成人网站在线观看| 国产无遮挡裸体免费视频| 少妇人妻偷人精品免费视频 | 成人毛片免费观看视频大全| a级毛片毛片免费观看久潮| 中美日韩在线网免费毛片视频| 亚洲乱亚洲乱妇无码| 亚洲欧美成人一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产精品| 美女18毛片免费视频| 特黄特色大片免费| 在线涩涩免费观看国产精品 | 精品亚洲A∨无码一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产精品乱码不卡√| 亚洲国产精品特色大片观看完整版| 亚洲精品无码国产| 91亚洲自偷在线观看国产馆| 亚洲日本视频在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕久久无码| 有码人妻在线免费看片| 毛片在线全部免费观看| 1024免费福利永久观看网站| 免费一级特黄特色大片| 亚洲免费观看视频| 日本免费一区尤物| 亚洲国产香蕉碰碰人人| 亚洲乱色熟女一区二区三区蜜臀| 日本激情猛烈在线看免费观看| 青柠影视在线观看免费| 香蕉视频在线观看免费国产婷婷| 免费看男人j放进女人j免费看| 女人18毛片水真多免费播放| 日韩精品福利片午夜免费观着| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水| 亚洲av无码电影网| 51精品视频免费国产专区|