February 18, 2005
If
anything about current interaction design can be called “glamorous,”
it’s creating Web applications. After all, when was the last time you
heard someone rave about the interaction design of a product that
wasn’t on the Web? (Okay, besides the iPod.) All the cool, innovative
new projects are online.
Despite this, Web interaction
designers can’t help but feel a little envious of our colleagues who
create desktop software. Desktop applications have a richness and
responsiveness that has seemed out of reach on the Web. The same
simplicity that enabled the Web’s rapid proliferation also creates a
gap between the experiences we can provide and the experiences users
can get from a desktop application.
That gap is closing. Take a look at Google Suggest. Watch the way the suggested terms update as you type, almost instantly. Now look at Google Maps.
Zoom in. Use your cursor to grab the map and scroll around a bit.
Again, everything happens almost instantly, with no waiting for pages
to reload.
Google Suggest and Google Maps are two examples
of a new approach to web applications that we at Adaptive Path have
been calling Ajax. The name is shorthand for Asynchronous JavaScript +
XML, and it represents a fundamental shift in what’s possible on the
Web.
Defining Ajax
Ajax isn’t a technology.
It’s really several technologies, each flourishing in its own right,
coming together in powerful new ways. Ajax incorporates:
The
classic web application model works like this: Most user actions in the
interface trigger an HTTP request back to a web server. The server does
some processing — retrieving data, crunching numbers, talking to
various legacy systems — and then returns an HTML page to the client.
It’s a model adapted from the Web’s original use as a hypertext medium,
but as fans of The Elements of User Experience know, what makes the Web good for hypertext doesn’t necessarily make it good for software applications.
Figure 1: The traditional model for web applications (left) compared to the Ajax model (right).
This
approach makes a lot of technical sense, but it doesn’t make for a
great user experience. While the server is doing its thing, what’s the
user doing? That’s right, waiting. And at every step in a task, the
user waits some more.
Obviously, if we were designing the
Web from scratch for applications, we wouldn’t make users wait around.
Once an interface is loaded, why should the user interaction come to a
halt every time the application needs something from the server? In
fact, why should the user see the application go to the server at all?
How Ajax is Different
An
Ajax application eliminates the start-stop-start-stop nature of
interaction on the Web by introducing an intermediary — an Ajax engine
— between the user and the server. It seems like adding a layer to the
application would make it less responsive, but the opposite is true.
Instead
of loading a webpage, at the start of the session, the browser loads an
Ajax engine — written in JavaScript and usually tucked away in a hidden
frame. This engine is responsible for both rendering the interface the
user sees and communicating with the server on the user’s behalf. The
Ajax engine allows the user’s interaction with the application to
happen asynchronously — independent of communication with the server.
So the user is never staring at a blank browser window and an hourglass
icon, waiting around for the server to do something.
Figure
2: The synchronous interaction pattern of a traditional web application
(top) compared with the asynchronous pattern of an Ajax application
(bottom).
Every user action that normally would
generate an HTTP request takes the form of a JavaScript call to the
Ajax engine instead. Any response to a user action that doesn’t require
a trip back to the server — such as simple data validation, editing
data in memory, and even some navigation — the engine handles on its
own. If the engine needs something from the server in order to respond
— if it’s submitting data for processing, loading additional interface
code, or retrieving new data — the engine makes those requests
asynchronously, usually using XML, without stalling a user’s
interaction with the application.
Who’s Using Ajax
Google
is making a huge investment in developing the Ajax approach. All of the
major products Google has introduced over the last year — Orkut, Gmail, the latest beta version of Google Groups, Google Suggest, and Google Maps
— are Ajax applications. (For more on the technical nuts and bolts of
these Ajax implementations, check out these excellent analyses of Gmail, Google Suggest, and Google Maps.) Others are following suit: many of the features that people love in Flickr depend on Ajax, and Amazon’s A9.com search engine applies similar techniques.
These
projects demonstrate that Ajax is not only technically sound, but also
practical for real-world applications. This isn’t another technology
that only works in a laboratory. And Ajax applications can be any size,
from the very simple, single-function Google Suggest to the very
complex and sophisticated Google Maps.
At Adaptive Path,
we’ve been doing our own work with Ajax over the last several months,
and we’re realizing we’ve only scratched the surface of the rich
interaction and responsiveness that Ajax applications can provide. Ajax
is an important development for Web applications, and its importance is
only going to grow. And because there are so many developers out there
who already know how to use these technologies, we expect to see many
more organizations following Google’s lead in reaping the competitive
advantage Ajax provides.
Moving Forward
The
biggest challenges in creating Ajax applications are not technical. The
core Ajax technologies are mature, stable, and well understood.
Instead, the challenges are for the designers of these applications: to
forget what we think we know about the limitations of the Web, and
begin to imagine a wider, richer range of possibilities.
It’s going to be fun.
posted on 2006-08-16 17:08
阿成 閱讀(247)
評(píng)論(0) 編輯 收藏 所屬分類:
Web