<rt id="bn8ez"></rt>
<label id="bn8ez"></label>

  • <span id="bn8ez"></span>

    <label id="bn8ez"><meter id="bn8ez"></meter></label>

    gembin

    OSGi, Eclipse Equinox, ECF, Virgo, Gemini, Apache Felix, Karaf, Aires, Camel, Eclipse RCP

    HBase, Hadoop, ZooKeeper, Cassandra

    Flex4, AS3, Swiz framework, GraniteDS, BlazeDS etc.

    There is nothing that software can't fix. Unfortunately, there is also nothing that software can't completely fuck up. That gap is called talent.

    About Me

     

    Why int can't be passed to wrapper type Byte constructor?

    Let's take a look at the following code:

    class Program {
    public static void main (String[] args) {
    byte a = 1;
    Byte b = new Byte(primitiveByte);
    Byte c = new Byte(1);
    Byte d = new Byte((byte)1);
    System.out.print(b.byteValue() + c.byteValue());
    }
    }

    Why does the line "byte a = 1;" compile without error? and Why does the "Byte c = new Byte(1);" has a compile-time error?. Both of them use the integer literal value 1 within the range of byte. So why explicit casting "(byte)1" is needed?

    The assignment conversion (such as "byte a = 1;") is different than the method invocation conversion (such as "Byte c = new Byte(1);").  They are two subsections in Java Language Specification 3rd Edition:

    • 5.2 Assignment Conversion : Assignment conversion converts the type of an expression to the type of a specified variable.
    • 5.3 Method Invocation Conversion : Method invocation conversion is applied to each argument in a method or constructor invocation and, except in one case, performs the same conversions that assignment conversion does.

    Assignment Conversion

    Please read the above link for the detail about Assignment Conversion in Java. For our example:

    byte a = 1; 

    The assignment will not generate the compiler error because at any time if an integral value is assigned to any of the primitive types (byte, char, short), and the right hand side value is within the range of the left hand side data type, it will not generate an error. Hence as 1 is within the range of byte (-128 to 127), it is not generating compiler error. For example:

    byte a = 129; //Compile-time error

    When you assign an intergal value to any primitive type variable, the compiler will do a range checking to see if this value is in the range of the left side data type. If it is NOT within the range of data type, a compile-time error occurs.

    If the righ-hand of assignment is a variable or expression, can narrowing primitive conversions still work (5.1.3 Narrowing Primitive Conversions in Java Language Specification 3rd Edition)?

    • If the variable is a compile-time constant and the constants value is within the range of the left side data type, then it can be assigned to a narrower primitive type. Otherwise, a compiler error will occurs.
    • If the expression is a compile-time constant expression and the evaluated value is within the range of the left side data type, then it can be assigned to a narrower primitive type. Otherwise, a compiler time error will occurs.

    For example:

    int i1=1;
    final int i2 = 127;
    final int i3 = 245;
    byte b1 = i1; //Compile-time error, not final variable
    byte b2 = i2; //OK, compile time constant
    byte b3 = i3; //Compile-time error, over range
    byte b4 = (i2 + 2); //OK, compile time constant expression
    byte b5 = (i1 + 2); //Compile-time error, not final variable

    Method Invocation Conversion

    Please read the above link for the detail about the Method Invocation Conversion in Java. For our example:

    Byte c = new Byte(1);

    A compile-time error will occurs because you are passing an integer to the constructor of the Wrapper class Byte, the compiler will not do the implicit casting here.

    The method invocation conversions specifically do not include the implicit narrowing of integer constants which is part of assignment conversion. The designers of the Java programming language felt that including these implicit narrowing conversions would add additional complexity to the overloaded method matching resolution process.

    posted on 2010-07-08 15:11 gembin 閱讀(429) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: JavaSE

    導航

    統計

    常用鏈接

    留言簿(6)

    隨筆分類(440)

    隨筆檔案(378)

    文章檔案(6)

    新聞檔案(1)

    相冊

    收藏夾(9)

    Adobe

    Android

    AS3

    Blog-Links

    Build

    Design Pattern

    Eclipse

    Favorite Links

    Flickr

    Game Dev

    HBase

    Identity Management

    IT resources

    JEE

    Language

    OpenID

    OSGi

    SOA

    Version Control

    最新隨筆

    搜索

    積分與排名

    最新評論

    閱讀排行榜

    評論排行榜

    free counters
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲人成毛片线播放| 色多多免费视频观看区一区| 成年女人免费视频播放77777 | 亚洲AV无码久久| 青青青国产在线观看免费网站| 无码天堂亚洲国产AV| 久久久久久a亚洲欧洲AV| 好吊妞视频免费视频| a一级爱做片免费| 亚洲国产成人久久综合一区| 日韩精品电影一区亚洲| 最近免费mv在线电影| 成在线人直播免费视频| 亚洲制服在线观看| 亚洲午夜久久久久久噜噜噜| 免费无码黄网站在线观看| 日本免费人成网ww555在线| 亚洲av无码成人影院一区| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区| 免费国产在线观看不卡| 国产大片91精品免费观看不卡| 一区二区三区精品高清视频免费在线播放| 2022年亚洲午夜一区二区福利| 无码国产亚洲日韩国精品视频一区二区三区 | 国内永久免费crm系统z在线| 亚洲乱码国产乱码精华| 亚洲日韩区在线电影| 中文字幕亚洲一区二区三区| 成人五级毛片免费播放| 99久久国产免费-99久久国产免费| 色屁屁在线观看视频免费| 亚洲国产综合精品中文第一| 亚洲国产人成在线观看69网站 | 久久久亚洲精品蜜桃臀| 永久免费av无码网站大全| 四虎成年永久免费网站| 免费日本一区二区| 久久精品无码专区免费| 免费无码专区毛片高潮喷水 | 在线观看AV片永久免费| 免费一级毛片无毒不卡|