<rt id="bn8ez"></rt>
<label id="bn8ez"></label>

  • <span id="bn8ez"></span>

    <label id="bn8ez"><meter id="bn8ez"></meter></label>

    gembin

    OSGi, Eclipse Equinox, ECF, Virgo, Gemini, Apache Felix, Karaf, Aires, Camel, Eclipse RCP

    HBase, Hadoop, ZooKeeper, Cassandra

    Flex4, AS3, Swiz framework, GraniteDS, BlazeDS etc.

    There is nothing that software can't fix. Unfortunately, there is also nothing that software can't completely fuck up. That gap is called talent.

    About Me

     

    Why int can't be passed to wrapper type Byte constructor?

    Let's take a look at the following code:

    class Program {
    public static void main (String[] args) {
    byte a = 1;
    Byte b = new Byte(primitiveByte);
    Byte c = new Byte(1);
    Byte d = new Byte((byte)1);
    System.out.print(b.byteValue() + c.byteValue());
    }
    }

    Why does the line "byte a = 1;" compile without error? and Why does the "Byte c = new Byte(1);" has a compile-time error?. Both of them use the integer literal value 1 within the range of byte. So why explicit casting "(byte)1" is needed?

    The assignment conversion (such as "byte a = 1;") is different than the method invocation conversion (such as "Byte c = new Byte(1);").  They are two subsections in Java Language Specification 3rd Edition:

    • 5.2 Assignment Conversion : Assignment conversion converts the type of an expression to the type of a specified variable.
    • 5.3 Method Invocation Conversion : Method invocation conversion is applied to each argument in a method or constructor invocation and, except in one case, performs the same conversions that assignment conversion does.

    Assignment Conversion

    Please read the above link for the detail about Assignment Conversion in Java. For our example:

    byte a = 1; 

    The assignment will not generate the compiler error because at any time if an integral value is assigned to any of the primitive types (byte, char, short), and the right hand side value is within the range of the left hand side data type, it will not generate an error. Hence as 1 is within the range of byte (-128 to 127), it is not generating compiler error. For example:

    byte a = 129; //Compile-time error

    When you assign an intergal value to any primitive type variable, the compiler will do a range checking to see if this value is in the range of the left side data type. If it is NOT within the range of data type, a compile-time error occurs.

    If the righ-hand of assignment is a variable or expression, can narrowing primitive conversions still work (5.1.3 Narrowing Primitive Conversions in Java Language Specification 3rd Edition)?

    • If the variable is a compile-time constant and the constants value is within the range of the left side data type, then it can be assigned to a narrower primitive type. Otherwise, a compiler error will occurs.
    • If the expression is a compile-time constant expression and the evaluated value is within the range of the left side data type, then it can be assigned to a narrower primitive type. Otherwise, a compiler time error will occurs.

    For example:

    int i1=1;
    final int i2 = 127;
    final int i3 = 245;
    byte b1 = i1; //Compile-time error, not final variable
    byte b2 = i2; //OK, compile time constant
    byte b3 = i3; //Compile-time error, over range
    byte b4 = (i2 + 2); //OK, compile time constant expression
    byte b5 = (i1 + 2); //Compile-time error, not final variable

    Method Invocation Conversion

    Please read the above link for the detail about the Method Invocation Conversion in Java. For our example:

    Byte c = new Byte(1);

    A compile-time error will occurs because you are passing an integer to the constructor of the Wrapper class Byte, the compiler will not do the implicit casting here.

    The method invocation conversions specifically do not include the implicit narrowing of integer constants which is part of assignment conversion. The designers of the Java programming language felt that including these implicit narrowing conversions would add additional complexity to the overloaded method matching resolution process.

    posted on 2010-07-08 15:11 gembin 閱讀(428) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: JavaSE

    導航

    統計

    常用鏈接

    留言簿(6)

    隨筆分類(440)

    隨筆檔案(378)

    文章檔案(6)

    新聞檔案(1)

    相冊

    收藏夾(9)

    Adobe

    Android

    AS3

    Blog-Links

    Build

    Design Pattern

    Eclipse

    Favorite Links

    Flickr

    Game Dev

    HBase

    Identity Management

    IT resources

    JEE

    Language

    OpenID

    OSGi

    SOA

    Version Control

    最新隨筆

    搜索

    積分與排名

    最新評論

    閱讀排行榜

    評論排行榜

    free counters
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲一区二区三区无码国产| 亚洲视频免费在线观看| 亚洲国产成人超福利久久精品| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦在线视色| 在线精品一卡乱码免费| 国内精品免费视频精选在线观看| 九九综合VA免费看| 亚洲精品国产高清在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕无乱码| 久久国产成人亚洲精品影院| 国产性生交xxxxx免费| 免费人成网站在线观看10分钟| 桃子视频在线观看高清免费视频| XXX2高清在线观看免费视频| 国产成人高清亚洲一区91| 中国china体内裑精亚洲日本| 亚洲理论片在线观看| 亚洲欧洲第一a在线观看| 久久亚洲精品中文字幕三区| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久久久| 日产乱码一卡二卡三免费| 国产成人免费高清激情视频| 91成人免费观看网站| 18禁成人网站免费观看| 久久精品一本到99热免费| 国产免费拔擦拔擦8X高清在线人| 国产精品免费视频观看拍拍| 又硬又粗又长又爽免费看 | 亚洲电影一区二区| 亚洲成在人线av| 亚洲阿v天堂在线| 久久精品7亚洲午夜a| 亚洲a在线视频视频| 亚洲AV无码专区电影在线观看| 亚洲成av人在线视| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线咪咕| 亚洲AV日韩AV天堂久久| 久久亚洲精品成人无码网站| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| 亚洲国产理论片在线播放|