<rt id="bn8ez"></rt>
<label id="bn8ez"></label>

  • <span id="bn8ez"></span>

    <label id="bn8ez"><meter id="bn8ez"></meter></label>

    jojo's blog--快樂憂傷都與你同在
    為夢想而來,為自由而生。 性情若水,風起水興,風息水止,故時而激蕩,時又清平……
    posts - 11,  comments - 30,  trackbacks - 0

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Jump to: navigation, search

    Contents

    [hide]

    In Internet terminology, a private network is typically a network that uses private IP address space, following the standards set by RFC 1918 and RFC 4193. These addresses are common in home and office local area networks (LANs), as using globally routable addresses is seen as impractical or unnecessary. Private IP addresses were originally created due to the shortage of publicly registered IP addresses created by the IPv4 standard, but are also a feature of the next generation Internet Protocol, IPv6.

    These addresses are private because they are not globally assigned, meaning they aren't allocated to a specific organization--instead, any organization needing private address space can use these addresses without needing approval from a regional Internet registry (RIR). Consequently, they are not routable on the public Internet, meaning that if such a private network wishes to connect to the Internet, it must use either a Network Address Translation (NAT) gateway, or a proxy server.

    The most common use of these addresses is in home networks, since most Internet Service Providers (ISPs) only allocate a single IP address to each customer, but many homes have more than one networking device (for example, several computers, or a printer). In this situation, a NAT gateway is almost always used to provide Internet connectivity. They are also commonly used in corporate networks, which for security reasons, are not connected directly to the internet, meaning globally routable addresses are unnecessary. Often a proxy, SOCKS gateway, or similar is used to provide restricted internet access to internal users. In both cases, private addresses are seen as adding security to the internal network, since it's impossible for an Internet host to connect directly to an internal system.

    Because many internal networks use the same private IP addresses, a common problem when trying to merge two such networks (e.g. during a company merger or takeover) is that both organizations have allocated the same IPs in their networks. In this case, either one network must renumber, often a difficult and time-consuming task, or a NAT router must be placed between the networks to translate one network's addresses before they can reach the other side.

    It is not uncommon for private address space to "leak" onto the Internet in various ways. Poorly configured private networks often attempt reverse DNS lookups for these addresses, putting extra load on the Internet's root nameservers. The AS112 project mitigates this load by providing special "blackhole" anycast nameservers for private addresses which only return "not found" answers for these queries. Organizational edge routers are usually configured to drop ingress IP traffic for these networks, which can occur either by accident, or from malicious traffic using a spoofed source address. Less commonly, ISP edge routers will drop such ingress traffic from customers, which reduces the impact to the Internet of such misconfigured or malicious hosts on the customer's network.

    A common misconception is that these addresses are not routable. While not routable on the public Internet, they are routable within an organization or site.

    The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has directed IANA to reserve the following IPv4 address ranges for private networks, as published in RFC 1918:

    RFC1918 name IP address range number of addresses classful description largest CIDR block (subnet mask) host id size
    24-bit block 10.0.0.0 – 10.255.255.255 16,777,216 single class A 10.0.0.0/8 (255.0.0.0) 24 bits
    20-bit block 172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255 1,048,576 16 contiguous class Bs 172.16.0.0/12 (255.240.0.0) 20 bits
    16-bit block 192.168.0.0 – 192.168.255.255 65,536 256 contiguous class Cs 192.168.0.0/16 (255.255.0.0) 16 bits

    Note that classful addressing is obsolete and no longer used on the Internet. For example, while 10.0.0.0/8 would be a single class A network, it is not uncommon for organisations to divide it into smaller /16 or /24 networks.

    [edit] Link-local addresses

    Main article: Zero configuration networking

    A second set of private networks is the link-local address range codified in RFC 3330 and RFC 3927. The intention behind these RFCs is to provide an IP address (and by implication, network connectivity) without a DHCP server being available and without having to configure a network address manually. The network 169.254/16 has been reserved for this purpose. Within this address range, the networks 169.254.0.0/24 and 169.254.255.0/24 have been set aside for future use.

    If a host on an IEEE 802 (ethernet) network cannot obtain a network address via DHCP, an address from 169.254.0.0 to 169.254.255.255 is assigned pseudorandomly. The standard prescribes that address collisions must be handled gracefully.

    Link-local addresses have even more restrictive rules than the private network addresses defined in RFC 1918: packets to or from link-local addresses must not be allowed to pass through a router at all (RFC 3927, section 7).

    [edit] Private networks and IPv6

    The concept of private networks and special addresses for such networks has been carried over to the next generation of the Internet Protocol, IPv6.

    The address block fc00::/7 has been reserved by IANA as described in RFC 4193. These addresses are called Unique Local Addresses (ULA). They are defined as being unicast in character and contain a 40-bit random number in the routing prefix to prevent collisions when two private networks are interconnected. Despite being inherently local in usage, the IPv6 address scope of unique local addresses is global (cf. IPv6, section "Address Scopes").

    A former standard proposed the use of so-called "site-local" addresses in the fec0::/10 range, but due to major concerns about scalability and the poor definition of what constitutes a site, its use has been deprecated since September 2004 by RFC 3879.

    [edit] Private use of other reserved addresses

    Several other address ranges, in addition to the official private ranges, are reserved for other or future uses, including 1.0.0.0/8 and 2.0.0.0/8[1]. Though discouraged, some enterprises have begun to use this address space internally for interconnecting private networks to eliminate the chance of address conflicts when using standards-based private ranges.[citation needed]

    IANA has stated that it will, eventually, allocate these ranges to the Regional Internet Registries and thus significant addressing problem might be encountered in the future due to non-standard use of reserved blocks.

    [edit] RFC References

    • RFC 1918"Address Allocation for Private Internets"
    • RFC 2036 – ""Observations on the use of Components of the Class A Address Space within the Internet."
    • RFC 2050 – ""Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines""
    • RFC 2101 – ""IPv4 Address Behaviour Today.""
    • RFC 2663 – ""IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations."
    • RFC 3022 – ""Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT)""
    • RFC 3330 – ""Special-Use IPv4 Addresses. IANA. September 2002::
    • RFC 3879"Deprecating Site Local Addresses"
    • RFC 3927"Dynamic Configuration of IPv4 Link-Local Addresses"
    • RFC 4193"Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"

    [edit] References

    1. ^ Internet Protocol v4 Address Space

    [edit] External links

    posted on 2009-07-03 11:20 Blog of JoJo 閱讀(284) 評論(0)  編輯  收藏 所屬分類: 每日一記Network 知識

    <2025年5月>
    27282930123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
    1234567

    常用鏈接

    留言簿(6)

    隨筆檔案

    文章分類

    文章檔案

    新聞分類

    新聞檔案

    相冊

    收藏夾

    搜索

    •  

    最新評論

    閱讀排行榜

    評論排行榜

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲AⅤ无码一区二区三区在线| 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区免费| 成年女性特黄午夜视频免费看 | 精品在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲沈樵| 97在线视频免费公开视频| 国产中文在线亚洲精品官网| 老司机精品视频免费| 亚洲免费在线观看| 一级毛片免费在线| 国产亚洲精品一品区99热| 久久99毛片免费观看不卡| 日产亚洲一区二区三区| 久草视频在线免费| 亚洲日韩AV一区二区三区四区| 最近2019中文字幕免费看最新| 色欲aⅴ亚洲情无码AV蜜桃| 亚洲免费日韩无码系列 | 在线观看免费a∨网站| 久久精品国产亚洲AV电影网| 亚洲国产天堂久久久久久| 成人精品视频99在线观看免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲成人免费网址| 亚洲色欲色欱wwW在线| 亚洲精品成人片在线观看| A级毛片高清免费视频在线播放| 亚洲最大黄色网址| 国产成人aaa在线视频免费观看| 一级看片免费视频囗交| 无码久久精品国产亚洲Av影片| 18国产精品白浆在线观看免费| 在线观看亚洲网站| 久久青青成人亚洲精品| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式影视| 亚洲丰满熟女一区二区哦| 国产亚洲AV手机在线观看| 麻豆最新国产剧情AV原创免费 | 永久黄色免费网站| 特级av毛片免费观看| 久久久久亚洲AV无码网站|