Heis的Blog

實際參數(shù)是如何傳遞到java方法的

（HOW ARGUMENTS ARE PASSED TO JAVA METHODS）

Suppose you're doing some Java programming, and you have a simple program like this:

假如你正在編寫java程序，然后你寫了以下一個程序：

In the main method, the variable arg1 is given the value 5, and then passed as an argument to the method f. This method declares a parameter of the same name, arg1, used to access the argument.

在main方法中，變量arg1賦值5，然后作為實際參數(shù)傳遞到方法f。這個方法聲明一個相同名字的形式參數(shù)arg1，被用于訪問實際參數(shù)。

What happens when you run this simple program? The method f modifies the value of arg1, so what value gets printed, 5 or 10? It turns out that 5 is the right answer. This implies that setting arg1 to 10 in method f has no effect outside of the method.

當(dāng)你執(zhí)行這個程序會發(fā)生什么事情呢？方法f修改了arg1的值，所以會打印什么呢，5還是10？這里5是正確的答案。這就意味著在方法f中，將arg1設(shè)為10并不影響到方法的外部。

Why does it work this way? The answer has to do with the distinction between the pass-by-value and pass-by-reference approaches to passing arguments to a method. The Java language uses pass-by-value exclusively. Before explaining what this means, let's look at an example of pass-by-reference, using C++ code:

為什么呢？答案在于區(qū)分使用“值傳遞”方式和“引用傳遞”方式給方法傳遞參數(shù)。Java語言使用與眾不同的“值傳遞”方式。在解釋它的意思之前，讓我們看看以下一個值傳遞的例子，這是用C++寫的。

Function f has two parameters. The first parameter is a pass-by-value parameter, the second a pass-by-reference one. When you run this program, the first assignment in function f has no effect in the caller (the main function). But the second assignment does, in fact, change the value of arg2 in main. The & in int& says that arg2 is a pass-by-reference parameter. This particular example has no equivalent in Java programming.

函數(shù)f有兩個形參。第一個是值傳遞，第二個是引用傳遞。當(dāng)你運行這個程序的時候，第一個參數(shù)賦值不影響調(diào)用者（main函數(shù)）。但是第二個參數(shù)賦值卻會，事實上，修改了main中arg2的值。在int&中的&表示arg2是一個引用傳遞的形參。這個特別的例子與java有所不同。

So what does pass-by-value actually mean? To answer this, it's instructive to look at some JVM¹ bytecodes that result from the following two commands:

那值傳遞到底是什么意思?要回答這個問題，有需要看一下運行以下兩行命令后的JVM的字節(jié)碼：

    javac CallDemo1.java

    javap -c -classpath . CallDemo1

Here is an excerpt from the output:

這里是輸出的片段：

In the main method, the instruction iconst_5 pushes the value 5 onto the operand stack of the Java virtual machine. This value is then stored in the second local variable (arg1, with args as the first local variable). iload_1 pushes the value of the second local variable onto the operand stack, where it will serve as an argument to the called method.

在main方法中，iconst_5指令將值5壓入JVM的操作數(shù)堆棧（operand stack）。然后這個值隨后存儲第二個本地變量（arg1的值存在第一個本地變量處）。iload_1指令將第二個本地變量的值再壓入操作數(shù)堆棧，作為被調(diào)用方法的形參。

Then the method f is invoked using the invokestatic instruction. The argument value is popped from the stack, and is used to create a stack frame for the called method. This stack frame represents the local variables in f, with the method parameter (arg1) as the first of the local variables.

然后方法f通過invokestatic指令調(diào)用。形參的值出棧，被用于為被調(diào)用的方法創(chuàng)建一個棧框架（stack frame）。這個棧框架表示所有f中的所有本地變量，而arg1實參將作為棧框架內(nèi)的第一個本地變量。

What this means is that the parameters in a method are copies of the argument values passed to the method. If you modify a parameter, it has no effect on the caller. You are simply changing the copy's value in the stack frame that is used to hold local variables. There is no way to "get back" at the arguments in the calling method. So assigning to arg1 in f does not change arg1 in main. Also, the arg1 variables in f and in main are unrelated to each other, except that arg1 in f starts with a copy of the value of arg1 in main. The variables occupy different locations in memory, and the fact that they have the same name is irrelevant.

這里的的意思是形式參數(shù)作為實際參數(shù)的拷貝，被傳入方法當(dāng)中。如果你（在方法體內(nèi)）修改了一個實際參數(shù)，它并不影響調(diào)用者，你只是修改了棧框架內(nèi)的拷貝而已。不可能在調(diào)用方法中“取回”實參的值。因此在f中給arg1賦值不會改變main中的arg1，而且這兩個arg1毫無關(guān)聯(lián)，除了main中的arg1是f中的arg1的一個拷貝之外。這兩個變量存在內(nèi)存的不同區(qū)域，事實上雖然它們有同樣的名字，但是毫不相干。

By contrast, a pass-by-reference parameter is implemented by passing the memory address of the caller's argument to the called function. The argument address is copied into the parameter. The parameter contains an address that references the argument's memory location so that changes to the parameter actually change the argument value in the caller. In low-level terms, if you have the memory address of a variable, you can change the variable's value at will.

對比值傳遞，引用傳遞的參數(shù)是指傳遞調(diào)用者實參的內(nèi)存地址給被調(diào)用的函數(shù)。實參地址拷貝給形參。形參指向了實參的內(nèi)存區(qū)域，所以對形參的修改同樣會修改到實參。從底層的角度來說，你可以任意修改變量的值，只要你有該變量的內(nèi)存地址。

The discussion of argument passing is complicated by the fact that the term "reference" in pass-by-reference means something slightly different than the typical use of the term in Java programming. In Java, the term reference is used in the context of object references. When you pass an object reference to a method, you're not using pass-by-reference, but pass-by-value. In particular, a copy is made of the object reference argument value, and changes to the copy (through the parameter) have no effect in the caller. Let's look at a couple of examples to clarify this idea:

關(guān)于參數(shù)傳遞的討論會復(fù)雜化，這是因為以上引用傳遞中的術(shù)語“引用”與Java編程中使用的（術(shù)語）存在微妙的區(qū)別。在java中，術(shù)語“引用”用于對象所有引用的上下文。當(dāng)你給方法傳遞一個對象引用，你并不是使用引用傳遞，更像是值傳遞。尤其是，這樣會拷貝一份實際參數(shù)的對象引用，（通過形參）對該拷貝的修改不會影響到調(diào)用者。讓我們用以下兩個例子來證明這個觀點。

In this example, a reference to an A object is passed to f. Setting arg1 to null in f has no effect on the caller, just as in the previous example. The value 5 gets printed. The caller passes a copy of the object reference value (arg1), not the memory address of arg1. So the called method cannot get back at arg1 and change it.

在這個例子中，A的引用傳遞給f。把arg1設(shè)置為null不影響調(diào)用者，就像前一個例子一樣。程序會打印5。調(diào)用者傳遞一份對象引用（arg1）的拷貝，而不是arg1的內(nèi)存地址。所以調(diào)用方法無法取回到（調(diào)用者的）arg1變量并修改它。

Here's another example:

What gets printed here is 10. How can that be? You've already seen that there's no way to change the caller's version of arg1 in the called method. But this code shows that the object referenced by arg1 can be changed. Here, the calling method and the called method have an object in common, and both methods can change the object. In this example, the object reference (arg1) is passed by value. Then a copy of it is made into the stack frame for f. But both the original and the copy are object references, and they point to a common object in memory that can be modified.

這個例子會打印10。為什么呢?通過之前那個例子，你已經(jīng)知道無法改變在調(diào)用方法中修改（實參）arg1。但是這里的代碼顯示arg1能夠被修改。這里調(diào)用方法和被調(diào)用方法有個共同的對象，兩個方法都能修改這個對象。在這個例子中，對象的引用（arg1）是值傳遞。他的一個拷貝被加入到f的棧框架。但是原來的和拷貝的對象都是對象引用，它們指向相同的內(nèi)存區(qū)域中的對象，因此可以修改。

In Java programming, it's common to say things like "a String object is passed to method f" or "an array is passed to method g." Technically speaking, objects and arrays are not passed. Instead, references or addresses to them are passed. For example, if you have a Java object containing 25 integer fields, and each field is 4 bytes, then the object is approximately 100 bytes long. But when you pass this object as an argument to a method, there is no actual copy of 100 bytes. Instead, a pointer, reference, or address of the object is passed. The same object is referenced in the caller and the called method. By contrast, in a language like C++, it's possible to pass either an actual object or a pointer to the object.

在java編程中，經(jīng)常可以聽到“一個String對象被傳遞到方法f”或者“一個數(shù)組被傳到方法g”。從技術(shù)上來說，不是傳遞一些對象或數(shù)組，而是傳遞引用或地址。例如，如果你有一個java對象包含25個整型的屬性，每個屬性占4 字節(jié)，那這個對象大約是占100字節(jié)。但是作為形式參數(shù)傳遞的時候，不會拷貝100 字節(jié)。而是傳遞一個指針、引用或地址。這樣調(diào)用者和被調(diào)用的方法都指向同一個對象。對比而言，與C++類似的語言，它可以傳遞真實的對象，也可以傳遞該對象的指針。

What are the implications of pass-by-value? One is that when you pass objects or arrays, the calling method and the called method share the objects, and both can change the object. So you might want to employ defensive copying techniques, as described in the September 4, 2001 Tech Tip, "Making Defensive Copies of Objects"

那什么是隱含的值傳遞呢？其一是當(dāng)你傳遞對象或數(shù)組，由調(diào)用方法和被調(diào)用方法共享，雙方都可修改對象。因此你可能想請入保護性拷貝技術(shù)，就像2001年9月4 日技術(shù)貼士“使用保護性拷貝技術(shù)。”

You can fix the case above, where the called method modifies an object, by making the class immutable. An immutable class is one whose instances cannot be modified. Here's how you to do this:

你可以修正以上的例子，當(dāng)被調(diào)用方法修改一個對象時，讓這個類成為不可變的。一個不可變類是指其實例不可修改的類。這里教你怎樣去定義它。

The printed result is 5. Now uncomment the modification of A in f and recompile the program. Notice that it results in a compile error. You have made A immutable, so it can't be legally modified by f.

打印結(jié)果是5，現(xiàn)在去掉CallDemo4中f方法內(nèi)的注釋和重新編譯。注意它會編譯出錯。因為你已經(jīng)讓A不可變了，所以f不能合法修改它。

Another implication of pass-by-value is that you can't use method parameters to return multiple values from a method, unless you pass in a mutable object reference or array, and let the method modify the object. There are other ways of returning multiple values, such as returning an array from the method, or creating a specialized class and returning an instance of it.

另一個隱含的值傳遞是你不能利用方法的形參在一個方法中返回多個值，除非你傳入一個不可變對象引用或數(shù)組，然后讓方法修改該對象。還有另外的方式返回多個值，例如從方法中返回一個數(shù)組，或者創(chuàng)建一個特別定義的類的實例。

For more information about how arguments are passed to Java Methods, see Section 1.8.1, Invoking a Method, and section 2.6.4, Parameter Values, in "The Java Programming Language Third Edition" by Arnold, Gosling, and Holmes. Also see item 13, Favor immutability, and item 24, Make defensive copies when needed, in "Effective Java Programming Language Guide" by Joshua

想知道更多關(guān)于Java方法中的實際參數(shù)的傳遞的信息，請看Arnold, Gosling, and Holmes的《The Java Programming Language Third Edition》中的1.8.1節(jié)“Invoking a Method”和2.6.4節(jié)“Parameter Values”。還有Joshua的《Effective Java Programming Language Guide》條款13 “Favor immutability”和24 “Make defensive copies when needed”。

術(shù)語對照翻譯