ruby script/plugin install http://svn.techno-weenie.net/projects/plugins/restful_authentication
ruby script/generate authenticated login_users login --include-activation
鍏朵腑login_users鏄痬odel
login鏄痗ontroller
–include-activation鍙傛暟鍐沖畾鏄惁鐢熸垚鍚戞柊娉ㄥ唽鐢ㄦ埛鍙戦佹縺媧葷爜鐨勪唬鐮併?/p>
鍦╮outes.rb鍔犲叆
map.resources :login_users
map.resource :login
濡傛灉鏄痳ails 1.2.3錛岄渶瑕佸姞鍏ョ殑control鏄細(xì)
map.resource :login, controller=>'login'
鍦╟onfig/environment.rb鍔犲叆
config.active_record.observers = :login_user_observer
浣犺繕鍙互鍦╮outes.rb涓姞鍏ワ紙鏍規(guī)嵁鑷繁鐨勯渶瑕侊級(jí)
map.signup '/signup', :controller => 'login_users', :action =>'new'
map.login '/login', :controller => 'login', :action =>'new'
map.logout '/logout', :controller => 'login', :action =>'destroy'
閰嶇疆database.yml錛屽緩绔嬫暟鎹簱login_development銆乴ogin_test
rake db:migrate
rake
ruby script/server
璁塊棶錛歨ttp://127.0.0.1:3000/login_users/new/
]]>
Updating Ruby on Rails
When I wrote Part 1, the current version of Rails was 0.9.3. At the time of this writing, Rails is up to version 0.10.0 and has some useful new features. I will use Rails 0.10.0 for this article. If you installed Rails after February 24, 2005, you already have 0.10.0 installed.
Figure 1 shows how to see what RubyGems you have installed (and their version numbers). As with Part 1, I am working on a Windows system, so you will need to translate if you use a different platform.
Figure 1. Listing installed RubyGems
Open a command window and run the command:
gem list --local
Tip: the command gem list --remote will show all the available RubyGems on the remote gem server on rubyforge.org.
If you don't have Rails 0.10.0 (or later) installed, then you will need to rerun the command:
gem install rails
MySQL security update
In Part 1, I recommended that you leave the MySQL root password blank because (at the time of writing) Rails did not support MySQL's new password protocol. Many of you were not happy with this state of affairs, and to make matters worse, there is now a virus that exploits password vulnerabilities in MySQL on Windows.
Happily, starting with version 0.9.4, Rails now supports the new password protocol.
New scaffold feature
Rails has a new scaffold feature, which I won't explore here, but it's cool enough that I want to make sure you know about it. This is best illustrated by an example.
Part 1 showed how to create a recipe model and controller with the commands:
ruby script\generate model Recipe
ruby script\generate controller Recipe
I then instantiated the scaffolding by inserting scaffold :recipe into the RecipeController class. The resulting CRUD controllers and view templates were created on the fly and are not visible for inspection.
The technique described above still works, but you now have another option. Run the command:
ruby script\generate scaffold Recipe
This generates both the model and the controller, plus it creates scaffold code and view templates for all CRUD operations. This allows you to see the scaffold code and modify it to meet your needs. Be careful using this if you've already created models, controllers, or view templates, as it will overwrite any existing files as it creates the scaffold code.
Completing the Recipe Application
It's time to round out the recipe application a bit. After that I'll present some other features of Rails that I'm sure you'll want to know about.
Remember that I created my cookbook application in the directory c:\rails\cookbook; all paths used in this article assume this base directory. If you chose a different location, please be sure to make the proper adjustments to the application paths you see in this article.
You can also download my cookbook source code for this tutorial in one single zip file. This works with Rails 0.13 and later, so if you're still using an older version, I suggest that you follow the upgrade instructions.
For those of you who are cheating (you know who you are) and plan to just download my source code without going through Part 1, you will also need to create a database named cookbook in MySQL and populate it using cookbook.sql.
Creating a new recipe with a category
Because the code still relies on the scaffolding to create new recipes, there is no way to assign a category to a recipe. This wouldn't be so bad--except that the page created to list all recipes assumes that every recipe will have a category, and it generates an error if this is not true. That means that in the way I left things in Part 1, if you add a new recipe, you'll receive errors while trying to list them.
The fix is to take over the new action from the scaffolding just as I showed already with the edit action. Edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\controllers\recipe_controller.rb and add a new method like in Figure 2.
Figure 2. The Recipe controller's new method
The code @recipe = Recipe.new creates a new, empty recipe object and assigns it to the instance variable @recipe. Remember, an instance of the Recipe class represents a row in the recipes database table. When creating a new recipe object, the Recipe class can assign default values for each field that the view template can use.
The Recipe model class doesn't currently set any such default values, but the view template I'll show off momentarily will use whatever is in the @recipe object to initialize the display form. Later, you could add default values in the Recipe class that will show up when you create a new recipe.
As with the edit action, this also retrieves a collection of all categories so that it can display a drop-down list of categories from which the user can choose. The @categories instance variable holds this list of categories.
In the directory c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\recipe, create a file named new.rhtml that contains the HTML template shown below. It's mostly standard HTML, with some extra code to create the <select> and <option> tags for the drop-down list of categories:
<html>
<head>
<title>New Recipe</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>New Recipe</h1>
<form action="/recipe/create" method="post">
<p>
<b>Title</b><br/>
<input id="recipe_title" name="recipe[title]" size="30" type="text" value=""/>
</p>
<p>
<b>Description</b><br/>
<input id="recipe_description" name="recipe[description]"
size="30" type="text" value=""/>
</p>
<p>
<b>Category:</b><br/>
<select name="recipe[category_id]">
<% @categories.each do |category| %>
<option value="<%= category.id %>">
<%= category.name %>
</option>
<% end %>
</select>
</p>
<p>
<b>Instructions</b><br/>
<textarea cols="40" id="recipe_instructions" name="recipe[instructions]"
rows="20" wrap="virtual">
</textarea>
</p>
<input type="submit" value="Create"/>
</form>
<a href="/recipe/list">Back</a>
</body>
</html>
This is not much different from the edit template from Part 1. I left out the recipe's date because I'll set it to the current date when a user posts the form back to the web app. This ensures that the recipe's date will always be its creation date.
If you look at the form tag, you will see that this form will post to a create action in the recipe controller. Edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\controllers\recipe_controller.rb and add this create method:
def create
@recipe = Recipe.new(@params['recipe'])
@recipe.date = Date.today
if @recipe.save
redirect_to :action => 'list'
else
render_action 'new'
end
end
This method first creates a new recipe object and initializes it from the parameters posted by the form in new.rhtml. Then it sets the recipe's date to today's date, and tells the recipe object to save itself to the database. If the save is successful, it redirects to the list action that displays all recipes. If the save fails, it redirects back to the new action so the user can try again.
Give it a try. Start the web server by opening a command window, navigating to c:\rails\cookbook, and running the command ruby script\server. Then browse to http://127.0.0.1:3000/recipe/new and add a new recipe like the one shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Adding a new recipe with a category
After you create the new recipe, you should see something like Figure 4.
Figure 4. List of all recipes
Deleting a recipe
If you remember from Part 1, once I took over the list action from the scaffolding I no longer had a way to delete a recipe. The list action must implement this. I'm going to add a small delete link after the name of each recipe on the main list page that will delete its associated recipe when clicked. This is easy.
First, edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\recipe\list.rhtml and add the delete link by making it look like this:
<html>
<head>
<title>All Recipes</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Online Cookbook - All Recipes</h1>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td width="40%"><p align="center"><i><b>Recipe</b></i></td>
<td width="20%"><p align="center"><i><b>Category</b></i></td>
<td width="20%"><p align="center"><i><b>Date</b></i></td>
</tr>
<% @recipes.each do |recipe| %>
<tr>
<td>
<%= link_to recipe.title,
:action => "show",
:id => recipe.id %>
<font size=-1>
<%= link_to "(delete)",
{:action => "delete", :id => recipe.id},
:confirm => "Really delete #{recipe.title}?" %>
</font>
</td>
<td><%= recipe.category.name %></td>
<td><%= recipe.date %></td>
</tr>
<% end %>
</table>
<p><%= link_to "Create new recipe", :action => "new" %></p>
</body>
</html>
The main change here is the addition of this link:
<%= link_to "(delete)", {:action => "delete", :id
=> recipe.id},
:confirm => "Really delete #{recipe.title}?" %>
This is different from the previous ones. It uses an option that generates a JavaScript confirmation dialog. If the user clicks on OK in this dialog, it follows the link. It takes no action if the user clicks on Cancel.
Try it out by browsing to http://127.0.0.1:3000/recipe/list. Try to delete the Ice Water recipe, but click on Cancel when the dialog pops up. You should see something like Figure 5.
Figure 5. Confirm deleting the Ice Water recipe
Now try it again, but this time click on OK. Did you see the results shown in Figure 6?
Figure 6. Error deleting the Ice Water recipe
Alright, I admit it; I did this on purpose to remind you that it's OK to make mistakes. I added a link to a delete action in the view template, but never created a delete action in the recipe controller.
Edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\controllers\recipe_controller.rb and add this delete method:
def delete
Recipe.find(@params['id']).destroy
redirect_to :action => 'list'
end
The first line of this method finds the recipe with the ID from the link, then calls the destroy method on that recipe. The second line merely redirects back to the list action.
Try it again. Browse to http://127.0.0.1:3000/recipe/list and try to delete the Ice Water recipe. Now it should look like Figure 7, and the Ice Water recipe should be gone.
Figure 7. Ice Water recipe is gone
Using layouts
Part 1 used Rails' scaffolding to provide the full range of CRUD operations for categories, but I didn't have to create any links from our main recipe list page. Instead of just throwing in a link on the recipe list page, I want to do something more generally useful: create a set of useful links that will appear at the bottom of every page. Rails has a feature called layouts, which is designed just for things like this.
Most web sites that have common headers and footers across all of the pages do so by having each page "include" special header and footer text. Rails layouts reverse this pattern by having the layout file "include" the page content. This is easier to see than to describe.
Edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\controllers\recipe_controller.rb and add the layout line immediately after the class definition, as shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8. Adding a layout to the recipe controller
This tells the recipe controller to use the file standard-layout.rhtml as the layout for all pages rendered by the recipe controller. Rails will look for this file using the path c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\layouts\standard-layout.rhtml, but you will have to create the layouts directory because it doesn't yet exist. Create this layout file with the following contents:
<html>
<head>
<title>Online Cookbook</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Online Cookbook</h1>
<%= @content_for_layout %>
<p>
<%= link_to "Create new recipe",
:controller => "recipe",
:action => "new" %>
<%= link_to "Show all recipes",
:controller => "recipe",
:action => "list" %>
<%= link_to "Show all categories",
:controller => "category",
:action => "list" %>
</p>
</body>
</html>
Only one thing makes this different from any of the other view templates created so far--the line:
<%= @content_for_layout %>
This is the location at which to insert the content rendered by each recipe action into the layout template. Also, notice that I have used links that specify both the controller and the action. (Before, the controller defaulted to the currently executing controller.) This was necessary for the link to the category list page, but I could have used the short form on the other two links.
Before you try this out, you must perform one more step. The previous recipe view templates contain some HTML tags that are now in the layout, so edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\recipe\list.rhtml and delete the extraneous lines at the beginning and end to make it look like this:
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td width="40%"><p align="center"><i><b>Recipe</b></i></td>
<td width="20%"><p align="center"><i><b>Category</b></i></td>
<td width="20%"><p align="center"><i><b>Date</b></i></td>
</tr>
<% @recipes.each do |recipe| %>
<tr>
<td>
<%= link_to recipe.title,
:action => "show",
:id => recipe.id %>
<font size=-1>
<%= link_to "(delete)",
{:action => "delete", :id => recipe.id},
:confirm => "Really delete #{recipe.title}?" %>
</font>
</td>
<td><%= recipe.category.name %></td>
<td><%= recipe.date %></td>
</tr>
<% end %>
</table>
Similarly, edit both c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\recipe\edit.rhtml and c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\recipe\new.rhtml to delete the same extraneous lines. Only the form tags and everything in between should remain.
Browse to http://127.0.0.1:3000/recipe/list, and it should look like Figure 9.
Figure 9. Using a layout with common links
The three links at the bottom of the page should now appear on every page displayed by the recipe controller. Go ahead and try it out!
If you clicked on the "Show all categories" link, you probably noticed that these nice new links did not appear. That is because the category pages display through the category controller, and only the recipe controller knows to use the new layout.
To fix that, edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\controllers\category_controller.rb and add the layout line as shown in Figure 10.
Figure 10. Adding a layout to the category controller
Now you should see the common links at the bottom of all pages of the recipe web application.
Showing recipes in a category
The final task is to add the ability to display only those recipes in a particular category. I'll take the category displayed with each recipe on the main page and turn it into a link that will display only the recipes in that category.
To do this, I'll change the recipe list view template to accept a URL parameter that specifies what category to display, or all categories if the user has omitted the parameter. First, I need to change the list action method to retrieve this parameter for use by the view template.
Edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\controllers\recipe_controller.rb and modify the list method to look like this:
def list
@category = @params['category']
@recipes = Recipe.find_all
end
Then edit c:\rails\cookbook\app\views\recipe\list.rhtml to look like this:
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td width="40%"><p align="center"><i><b>Recipe</b></i></td>
<td width="20%"><p align="center"><i><b>Category</b></i></td>
<td width="20%"><p align="center"><i><b>Date</b></i></td>
</tr>
<% @recipes.each do |recipe| %>
<% if (@category == nil) || (@category == recipe.category.name)%>
<tr>
<td>
<%= link_to recipe.title,
:action => "show",
:id => recipe.id %>
<font size=-1>
<%= link_to "(delete)",
{:action => "delete", :id => recipe.id},
:confirm => "Really delete #{recipe.title}?" %>
</font>
</td>
<td>
<%= link_to recipe.category.name,
:action => "list",
:category => "#{recipe.category.name}" %>
</td>
<td><%= recipe.date %></td>
</tr>
<% end %>
<% end %>
</table>
There are two changes in here that do all the work. First, this line:
<% if (@category == nil) || (@category == recipe.category.name)%>
decides whether to display the current recipe in the loop. If the category is nil (there was no category parameter on the URL), or if the category from the URL parameter matches the current recipe's category, it displays that recipe.
Second, this line:
<%= link_to recipe.category.name,
:action => "list",
:category => "#{recipe.category.name}" %>
creates a link back to the list action that includes the proper category parameter.
Browse to http://127.0.0.1:3000/recipe/list and click on one of the Snacks links. It should look like Figure 11.
Figure 11. Showing only snacks
What is it? How long did it take?
That's it! This is a reasonably functional online cookbook application developed in record time. It's a functional skeleton just begging for polish.
Wading through all of the words and screenshots in this article may have obscured (at least somewhat) exactly what this code can do and in what amount of developer time. Let me present some statistics to try to put it all into perspective.
Fortunately, Rails has some built-in facilities to help answer these questions. Open up a command window in the cookbook directory (c:\rails\cookbook) and run the command:
rake stats
Your results should be similar to Figure 12. Note that LOC means "lines of code."
Figure 12. Viewing development statistics
I won't give a detailed description of each number produced, but the last line has the main figure I want to point out:
Code LOC: 47
This says that the actual number of lines of code in this application (not counting comments or test code) is 47. It took me about 30 minutes to create this application! I could not have come even close to this level of productivity in any other web app development framework that I have used.
Maybe you're thinking that this is an isolated experience using an admittedly trivial example. Maybe you're thinking that this might be OK for small stuff, but it could never scale. If you harbor any such doubts, the next section should lay those to rest.
Ruby on Rails Success Stories
Rails is a relatively young framework. As of this writing, it's been barely six months since the first public release. Yet it debuted with such a stunning feature set and solid stability that a vibrant developer community quickly sprang up around it. Within this time frame, several production web applications have been deployed that were built with Ruby on Rails.
]]>